Not too far down the road, your dressage test likely will be judged to some extent by Artificial Intelligence (AI), as well as a human official. And you probably can expect AI to be used to a certain degree in horse inspections at competitions in the future.
That was part of the discussion during a press conference following a closed-door gathering last week in the Netherlands of the International Dressage Riders Club, the International Dressage Trainers Club and the Dressage Organizers and Officials organization.
So how should AI be used in judging dressage? The most obvious answer is for items such as keeping track of the number of lead changes, regularity of paces or how many times a horse performs a pirouette.
“There are a lot of possibilities,” said Klaus Roeser, secretary-general of the IDRC, noting riders and trainers are quite interested but the judges “are a little bit scared about it. They may think, `Maybe in five years, they don’t need us anymore.’ ”
But Klaus said, “That’s totally not the point,” explaining AI may reduce the complexity of the judging task, so the officials “can concentrate more on the quality. Because quality you can’t measure with AI.”
In the near future, the use of AI will be tested, and judges are open to the idea, according to Klaus. It was pointed out that use of AI may help spectators understand the sport better.
As dressage reacts to being under pressure after several well-publicized, high-profile horse abuse cases in the past year, more than 120 stakeholders of the sport at the meeting discussed that situation and others that can impact the future of dressage, particularly its inclusion in the Olympic and Paralympic Games.
Suggestions gleaned from the gathering on a look at the state of the sport went to Ronan Murphy, the FEI’s director of dressage, who is developing a new strategy for the discipline.
Issues center around perception, welfare, transparency and trust, items that need to be addressed in order to improve the situation, said Linda Keenan, secretary-general of the IDTC. Linda said “specific things” will be done “to gain more trust,” but until Ronan is ready to reveal them, no more can be said.
Klaus suggested that having open stable days so people can see how the horses are taken care of, could be a helpful approach, but he added, “it will never prevent if you have boys or girls doing bad things behind closed doors.”
Linda mentioned that riding that is not good enough can be conflated to become a welfare issue, when it’s simply “not fulfilling the goals to get a high score.” She also noted, “just because you’re not doing something perfectly is not the same as being abusive. We really need to do a better job of clarifying what is abuse and what isn’t abuse.”
Organizers addressed the difficulties they are having putting on CDIs and the financial pressures that exist in connection with that. At its general assembly this week, the FEI will address cutting the number of judges officiating at a World Cup Final from seven to five for cost-saving reasons.
The Dutch and Swedish federations made a proposal to allow use of a snaffle, instead of a double bridle, at Grand Prix in international competitions. It will not be voted on at this year’s general assembly, but Linda said it seems the FEI wants to encourage organizers to offer restricted classes where the snaffle is used, though such classes could not be Olympic qualifiers.
She noted the double bridle is not a welfare issue. Linda added a recent study showed there are more mouth lesions with snaffles. Riding with a double bridle is a skill; “it’s one of the ultimate skills of dressage riding. Competitors need to prove their competence at the top level in terms of using a double bridle.”
Other items discussed at the meeting included the effect that shape and fitting of the bit and bridle have on horse performance, the effect of saddle design on performance and the rider’s seat and the impending device for testing the tightness of a noseband, which is not yet available, so it’s not possible to give a recommendation on how to deal with it, Linda said.
