The president of the Austrian Equestrian Federation (OEPS) called the change in the blood rule for show jumping enacted by the FEI last week “a clear step backwards.
Elisabeth Max-Theurer, who won Olympic dressage gold in 1980, stated that “blood — especially in the area of mouth or flanks — must never be considered acceptable in equestrian sport. If a horse is bleeding through the influence of a rider, it is a sign that something is wrong. Then the protection of the horse must take precedence — and not the continuation of the competition.”
Austria joins Britain, Germany, Sweden, Denmark and other strong equestrian countries inI rejecting the rule change for their national shows.
(Click here to read the story about the change).
The jumping blood rule applies only to that discipline, although there will be future consideration of standardizing the blood rule among the disciplines.
The dressage rule, meanwhile, was broadened somewhat to mandate that the steward shall inform the judge at C if fresh blood is found in the area of the mouth as well as the area of the spurs at the end of the test. Meanwhile, if the judge at C suspects fresh blood from the moment the horse enters the area around the arena until the end of the test, they can stop the test to check for blood. If there is blood, the horse is eliminated; if there is none, the horse may continued.
“The welfare of the horse is above everything,” said Elisabeth, a prominent dressage judge. who is looking at the big picture of the sport beyond her own discipline.
“And we will communicate that way. I think it is our duty to make a mark here. Equestrian sport must not move away from its ethical basis. We must show that sporting success and animal welfare are not a contradiction. Only in this way can we remain credible — to the public, the sponsors and, above all, to the horses themselves.”
She believes, “This regulation puts an additional burden on all parties involved – for the ground jury, for the stewards, for the organizers and the riders. It does not create clarity, but grey areas. Instead of an immediate exclusion, there will be warnings, entries in the “FEI Warning Register” and suspensions and fines for repetition.
“This sounds strict, but is hardly controllable in practice and distracts from the actual question: Why is a horse even seen with blood on the body in the competition? It’s a bad signal to the outside world. Equestrian sport is constantly in the public eye. If the impression arises that blood is tolerated `to a certain extent,’ this massively jeopardizes the confidence in our sport.”
The fact that the change was decided by 56 votes, with 20 nations against it, is “a clear sign that the democratic balance within the FEI has been out of balance. In the FEI today, every member country – whether France with 11,204 registered tournament horses and 5,391 registered athletes or, for example, Angola or Ethiopia with zero registered horses and athletes – has exactly one vote. That’s absurd. Countries without significant equestrian activity decide on regulations that affect the core of our sport,” Elisabeth pointed out.
“We urgently need reform of the voting system,” she emphasized.
“The international ski association (FIS) has demonstrated this: There, the voices are weighted according to the size and importance of the associations. The European equestrian nations bear the responsibility, finance large parts of the system: The entire EEF has 59,096 registered horses and 28,136 athletes but only 42 votes. All other groups in the world have a total of 18,541 registered horses and 13,785 athletes. That is a third of all active people and a quarter of all horses, but they come together to 92 votes.”
As long as the system remains skewed, she said, “one cannot speak of `democratic decisions’ in the true sense. This puts the credibility of the FEI at a lasting risk. Moreover, in Europe, animal welfare is a very important factor. In many voting countries, human rights are not of high importance – and animal welfare is unlikely to be important at all or all the less so.”
She maintains the situation “endangers the acceptance of our sport in the long term — and thus also its Olympic future. If the World Federation takes decisions that weaken animal welfare, it provides all those arguments that want to push equestrian sport out of the Olympic program anyway. We must be aware that equestrian sport can only survive if society sees that the horse is our partner — not a means to an end. Any rule that dilutes this principle is dangerous.”
She is concerned that “if the FEI continues like this, we will eventually lose the Olympic status for show jumping, dressage and eventing — and at the Paralympics for the Para-dressage. The pressure on the IOC (International Olympic Committee) is growing to critically examine sports with animal participation. That is why any weakening of animal welfare is a step in the wrong direction.”
Show jumping is no longer a part of modern pentathlon in the Olympics after headlines screamed about a horse who refused being punched at the 2020 Games.
Elisabeth stated that “One cannot, on the one hand, preach in every sentence ‘Horse Welfare,’ and at the same time, adopt rules that do just the opposite. We call for a uniform, cross-disciplinary regulation that applies in all FEI sports and which generally does not tolerate blood on the mouth and flank.
“In addition, a fairer weighting of votes must be seriously discussed. Only in this way can the professional competence regain weight. Europe is the center of equestrian sport…organizational and ethical. If our voice no longer counts, then something is fundamentally wrong.”
She feels “the foundation is crumbling. Without clear ethical guidelines, the best systems are of no use to us.”